Showing posts with label P. Show all posts
Showing posts with label P. Show all posts

Phantom of the Paradise (1974): De Palma's Tale of Rock, Roll, and Revenge

Today’s selection for Terrifying Tuesday might be a little light on the terror, but it gains plenty of horror cachet by taking its inspiration from Phantom of the Opera, Dorian Grey, and Faust. Plus, Paul Williams, even if he did write “The Rainbow Connection“, is a creepy little dude. The film in question is Brian De Palma’s 1974 rock/horror/comedy Phantom of the Paradise. The inspiration for the film hit him when he was in an elevator and heard a Beatles song as muzak. It made him dwell on how corporations take artistic endeavors and boil away what made it special in the pursuit of the almighty dollar. After combining these thoughts with the aforementioned horror classics and the tunes of the aforementioned creepy Paul Williams, De Palma created a truly original work.






The film follows the downfall of songwriter/composer Winslow (William Finley) whose cantata, based on the story of Faust, is taken by super producer Swan (Paul Williams) as the perfect piece to open his new venue, The Paradise. Swan steals the cantata away and frames Winslow for drug dealing. After breaking out of jail, Winslow goes on a rampage in Swan’s record factory which leads to him getting his face stuck in a record press. Donning a mask and costume, Winslow becomes The Phantom, and agrees to finish the cantata if Swan will cast Phoenix (Jessica Harper) in the lead role. The producer, of course, double crosses The Phantom, steals the finished music, and casts the glam rocker Beef (Gerrit Graham) in the lead. The Phantom pledges to ruin the production, and soon he discovers that Swan is part of his own Faustian bargain.

Phantom of the Paradise was De Palma’s fourth major production following the trio of films, Hi Mom (1970), Get to Know Your Rabbit (1972), and Sisters (1973), that established him as one of the up and coming directors in the business. The studios were not keen on De Palma’s script, and so he started shopping the idea to record companies finally getting somewhere when an A&M executive introduced him to Paul Williams. At the time Williams was an in demand composer with hits like The Carpenters’ “We’ve Only Just Begun” on his resume. Originally, De Palma wanted Williams to write the songs, but after getting to know Williams, De Palma thought that the composer should take on the part of the wronged songwriter Winslow. At first, Williams agreed, but then he decided that he could not be menacing enough as The Phantom and instead agreed to play Swan.

Williams' portrayal of the super evil super producer is dead on, and this is only enhanced by his long floppy hair, large tinted glasses, and short stature. He seemed like an evil executive who was trying to be hip. The character was loosely based on producer Phil Spector, and in fact the character had been called Specter in early drafts. That wasn’t the only name change that went on in the film. Swan was intended to be the CEO of a media conglomerate called Swan Song, but after Led Zeppelin’s manager created a real record label called Swansong, the film, which had already been shot, had to be altered to replace mentions of Swan Song with Death Records. Unfortunately for De Palma’s well made film, some places where the logos had to be changed look really clumsily done and it takes away from the picture. De Palma also thought it took away from the picture and its indictment of corporate greed to reduce Swan to simply a producer. However, looking at it through a prism of modern times, when so much of music is controlled by producers, it seems just as meaningful.

Though Williams is not the star of the film, he nearly steals the picture away from William Finley as Winslow/The Phantom. Thankfully, Finley has some great comic moments before and after he becomes The Phantom. My favorite scene has to be when Winslow, in fully caped and bird masked Phantom garb, uses a plunger to attack glam rocker Beef in the shower. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone be menaced with a plunger before, but both Finley and Gerrit Graham sell the scene perfectly. Graham was another highlight of the film, and his performance as the fey rocker was probably the strongest full on comedic performance in the film.

There are a couple of other actors I’d like to briefly mention. First off is Jessica Harper. Not only did she beat Linda Ronstadt out for the role, she sang and acted the part beautifully. Harper really sold the ingenue role perfectly, and it made me wonder if Dario Argento saw Phantom of the Paradise before he cast Harper in his film Susperia. It definitely seems like De Palma’s film would have appealed to the Italian director. The other actor that I want to mention has the other purely comedic performance in the film, and that is George Memmoli as Swan’s right hand man Philbin. Memmoli, who also appears in one of my favorite films, Mean Streets, is delightfully sleazy throughout and has a kind of faux hippie air around his character that I found really interesting.

When Phantom of the Paradise was released, it was not a rousing success. In fact few people really got the picture, though strangely it was a massive hit in the Canadian city of Winnipeg running for four and half months and selling over 20,000 soundtrack albums. (For more info check out the interesting essay Why Winnipeg?) In the intervening years Phantom of the Paradise has grown as cult film, but it hasn’t ever reached the wide appeal of the other well known rock/horror/musical The Rocky Horror Picture Show. De Palma went on to direct Scarface and Carrie, Williams wrote the hit song Evergreen from A Star Is Born and basically all the classic Muppet songs, and The Phantom of the Paradise became a cult classic that doesn’t get the attention that it deserves. I can’t recommend this film enough. It has a little something for fans of comedy, horror, and even musicals to enjoy. So check it out, but don’t let Paul Williams creep you out too much.

Bugg Rating

Psycho II (1983): More Psycho Killer? Qu'est-ce que c'est ? Indeed.

Even though I’ve heard good things about Psycho II, it’s a film that I’ve avoided for some time. Long time readers will know that I can talk about Mr. Hitchcock and his films ad nauseum, and while Vertigo remains my favorite, Psycho runs a tight second. It’s a virtually flawless film, and it established the Master of Suspense as a legend in the world of horror as well. Psycho is a film I’ve seen dozens of times, and I’ve spent countless hours thinking and researching it (if you have any doubt about that you can check out my massive three post review starting HERE). The idea of a sequel made more than twenty years after the fact and directed by the man who helmed Patrick and Cloak and Dagger just didn’t appeal to me. Recently I ran across a copy on DVD and since a few friends of mine encouraged me to see it, I bought a copy of Psycho II.

Wisely, the sequel is set 22 years after the events of the first film, and Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) is being released from the mental institution much to the dismay of Lila Loomis (Vera Miles returning as the same character she played in Hitchcock’s film). Norman’s doctor, Bill Raymond (Robert Loggia), says that his patient is completely rehabilitated, and he’s got Norman a job in a local diner. There he meets a waitress, Mary Samuels (Meg Tilly) who he invites to stay at his home and help him recover. It’s not long before Bates starts to get phone calls, have visions, and receive notes from his mother, and Norman starts to descend into madness again. Only this time he’s getting some help, Mary Samuels is really Mary Loomis, and she and her mother plan to put Norman back into the asylum before he can kill again.

I want to say right off the bat that Psycho II far exceeded my expectations. Granted they were pretty low, but I was really surprised how much I got out of this film. Since I didn’t know anything about it going in, it was an interesting twist that Norman was going to be the protagonist this time around. The film does a good job with making the first picture’s psycho killer into a sympathetic character. I can’t think of another occasion where this transition has worked. As a viewer I was torn between wanting Norman to remain sane and waiting for him to get tarted up and start stabbing people in the shower. For at least half of the film, it’s unclear what is real and what is in his head, and it makes for quite an engrossing watch.

Anthony Perkins is really in fine form here, and even 22 years after he originated the role, he manages to capture the same nervous ticks that made Norman Bates such an interesting character. The best parts come after Norman discovers the plot to drive him insane and begins to turn the tables. Watching Perkins portray the barely restrained glee as Norman messes with Mary and Lila’s heads brought a smile to my face. It’s really impressive that Perkins could summon a character that was so far in his past, but perhaps more interestingly make him sympathetic. We know Norman is a killer, and we’ve seen what he did to Marian Crane in the shower. Somehow Perkins’ performance makes that all fade away. For years he tried to escape the shadow of Norman Bates. With Psycho II, he embraced it fully and what came though was a thrill to watch.

Now Mr. Perkins is not the only returning actor. Vera Miles does a wonderful job as the conniving Lila Loomis (her maiden name is of course Crane). I can’t say I blame Lila for wanting Norman locked away. If he killed my sister then I would too. Yet as much as Norman is our sympathetic protagonist, Lila is played as the evil, scheming antagonist. I think this was a very interesting choice. If the film had been about Norman getting out, killing folks, and Lila being the crusader who brought him to justice, it would have felt like a silly cop out. Many of Miles’ scenes are shared with Meg Tilly as Mary Loomis. It was quite a good little nod to the original film when she introduces herself to Norman as Mary Samuels, the name Marion Crane used to check in at the Bates Motel. Tilly is good in her part as well, but she’s saddled with one of the most tragic haircuts in movie history. Seriously, this is a mullet that would make Billy Ray Cyrus cry.

There are two other performances I want to point out briefly. The first is Robert Loggia as Norman’s shrink. No matter what film I see him in; Robert Loggia is one of those actors who seem to play everything the same. That really doesn’t bother me, and I always enjoy saying Robert Loggia. It’s something of a mantra to me. I don’t know what it is, but there’s a calming effect. Say it with me. Robert Loggia. Doesn’t that feel nice? The other interesting fellow is Mr. Prime Time Bare Ass himself, Dennis Franz. I don’t know if Franz has ever looked quite as slimy as he did as the scoundrel Warren Toomey who is the new manager of the Bates Motel. The scenes he shares with Perkins are really nice, and it really takes someone special to seem more reprehensible than a serial killer.

I wasn’t a huge fan of director Richard Franklin’s film Patrick although I do really love his 1984 feature Cloak and Dagger. Psycho II can surely be added to the list of his films I enjoy. Franklin chose John Carpenter’s frequent collaborator Dean Cundey as his cinematographer, and the pair did a really good job of invoking Hitchcockian style without feeling like they were cribbing from the master. Psycho II was also very well written by screenwriter Tom Holland whose other credits include Child’s Play, Fright Night, Class of 1984, and the aforementioned Cloak and Dagger. Holland made all the right choices, and the pairing of his script with Franklin’s direction lets the film have a life of its own without existing only in the shadow of its predecessor.

If anyone was going to be really harsh on a sequel to Psycho, then I think it would be me. I was all set to rip this film apart and trash it from stem to stern, but surprisingly, I didn’t get a chance to do so. Now I don’t want you folks to get me wrong. Psycho II never reaches the level that the original film climbed to, but judged solely on its own merits, Psycho II is a film I can recommend to fans of the original. Getting to spend another ninety minutes delving into the psyche of Norman Bates with this quality film is enough to leave a smile on anyone’s face.

Bugg Rating