Showing posts with label William Castle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Castle. Show all posts

Buggin' On Shorts: William Castle's Game Show -The Plot Thickens (1963)

While William Castle, the King of Gimmicks, is best known for his movies like 13 Ghosts, Straight Jacket, and The Tingler, he also dabbled in television. He directed many episodes of the '50's TV show The Men of Annapolis, produced the supernatural anthology series Circle of Fear in the early '70's, and he even created a game show. That's right you heard me right, a William Castle gameshow! Like most of his projects, The Plot Thickens is a high concept affair. A panel consisting of a real detective, an average contestant, a guest celebrity and Groucho Marx watch a ten minute mystery film, put the suspects from the film to question, and determine the perpetrator of the crime. If the detective and a contestant both get it right you win $500, but if the actors stump the gumshoe and a contestant gets it right, they win a cool thousand bucks.

Unfortunately, Castle's game show didn't make it to the air and only this pilot episode remains. It's too bad because it's a pretty entertaining show. Plus if you watch closely you'll see that the mystery in this episode was penned by Psycho scribe Robert Bloch and it featured James Callahan (Grandpa William Powell of Charles in Charge) as the assistant Arthur, Arthur Batanides (Officer Kirkland in Police Academy 4 through 6) as the fake Swami, Jack Linkletter (Host of Hootnanny) as the host (or D.A. as they call him), Jan Sterling (High School Confidential, The Human Jungle) as the celebrity guest, and Warrene Ott (The Phantom Planet, Undertaker and his Pals) as the bailiff in a cat costume.

This thing is as rare as it comes, and it wasn't even on YouTube until I put it up there. So check out Mr. Castle's The Plot Thickens and wish that we had shows like this to enjoy now instead of Minute to Win It or Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader?


And come back tomorrow for the first Guest Post this month for Hitch on the Hump where the indomitable, vivacious Ms. Christine of Paracinema is going to have a real treat for us all! 


This show is the rarest of the rare, but I split it up into four bite size pieces and got it up on YouTube. Check it out now just in case it gets yanked.

Halloween Top 13: The Remake- #12: House on Haunted Hill (1999)

Hello and welcome back everyone, while yesterday’s film came from the dark depths of Michael Bay’s horror remake machine Platinum Dunes, today’s offering sprang forth from another production company, Dark Castle Productions, and a couple of other big time Hollywood names, Joel Silver and Robert Zemeckis. Formed in 1999 with the expressed idea of remaking William Castle’s classic shockers, Dark Castle’s first offering was today’s entry on the countdown, House on Haunted Hill. First off, I want to say that the 1959 film starring Vincent Price and directed by William Castle will always stand as one of the classics of horror cinema. So the fact that this remake could overcome that kind of mark against it and end up on this list is a testament to the production. If that doesn’t convince you how I feel about this flick, then let me say this, Chris Kattan is in it and I still like it, and better still, I think he's good in it.

Anyone who is familiar with the 1959 film will be happy to see that the same basic structure of the film is firmly in place. A group of revelers is invited to spend the night in a haunted house, in this case an asylum where hundreds of people were killed. In 40 years, prices had gone up considerably for such a feat. In '59  $10,000 might do, forty years later these folks are in it to the tune of a cool million if they make it through the night. The host is once again an eccentric millionaire, this time Stephen Price (Geoffrey Rush) who made his money off terrifyingly twisted amusement park rides, and the party is for his wife Evelyn (Famke Janssen) who he appears to despise. He had chosen a group of guests who would all be desperate for the money, but the people who arrived, while they might share that same trait, are not the people Price claims to have invited.Once the asylum’s ancient security system gets tripped trapping them all all inside until the morning, the bodies start piling up. As some of the guest fall prey to a darkness in the house connected to diabolical experiments, but some of the dead faced a more earthbound foe.

Just in case you don’t want light spoilers of an eleven year old film, I’m going to go ahead and warn you to skip down to the next paragraph. To properly discuss what I like about the film, I have to talk about the last half. As deaths start flying, and the reveals start to happen, House on Haunted Hill continues to swing back and forth between the horrors of Man and the evils of the supernatural world. It’s almost as if the living and the dead are competing to see who can be the bigger bastard. I love that the filmmakers chose to bring in that dynamic which was so much a part of the original film. At first glance, before I watched House on Haunted Hill, I didn’t have much hope for it. It looked like a straight up supernatural film that landed Geoffrey Rush because he had always desperately wanted to wear a pencil thin moustache. While I can’t say for certain that the latter isn’t true, House on Haunted Hill wisely didn’t put all their eggs in one basket. Mixing portions of a ghost movie with a crime thriller and a gore film, they came up with what I consider a successful mix that combines the three genres while paying homage to Castle’s original film.

Welcome back all you folks who were scared off by the spoilers in the last paragraph. In case you wondered, the rest of us were not just talking about you. I was talking about director William Malone. They don’t make them much more interesting than this guy. He got his start in the horror biz at age 19 working at the legendary Don Post studios where he would design The infamous William Shatner mask that we all know as Michael Myers. He made his first feature film, Scared to Death, in 1981, but many Klaus Kinski fans might recognize his name from the film Creature. He then moved into serialized TV getting jobs directing Freddy’s Nightmares and Tales from the Crypt. It was probably the second of those two jobs that brought him to the attention of Tales executive producer Robert Zemeckis who asked Malone to direct House on Haunted Hill. Malone and cinematographer Rick Bota (Barb Wire, The Glimmer Man, Tales from the Crypt (TV)) did a good job tempering down the music video style editing, sweeping cross section camera zooms, and jerky camera moves that were so popular around that time. There is still some of that going on, but Bota and Malone create an genuine atmosphere, an element so often forgotten or overlooked in modern horror.

I would be remiss if I didn’t talk some about the cast of this film because so many of the stars went on to much bigger things. Ali Larter, later a star of NBC’s Heroes, and Taye Diggs, famous for reasons I’m not sure of, star as two of the “contestants” brought to the house. Diggs is as serviceable as anything I have seen him in, but Ms. Larter got much, much better between this film and developing superpowers. Also making appearances are Fanke Janssen, who would go on to play Jean Grey in X-Men, Peter Gallagher,  a veteran actor who somehow ended up on both  The O.C. and Californication, James Marsters of Buffy fame, and Lisa Loeb, who, as I have been told, misses you. That still leaves me with three actors I have to talk about a little more in depth.

First off, he has a barely there role, but if you squint during scenes of the evil spectral doctor, it is none other the genre film stalwart Jeffery Combs. Any film is better for having him in it. (Even Castle Freak) Next up is Chris Kattan. I mentioned him earlier, and I often just hate everything about him. However, his nervous, high strung, sadly comic character here was fully realized, and for a moment, and only a moment, I forgot all about Mr. Peepers. The last actor is the most important. Like Vincent Price in the original House on Haunted Hill, Geoffrey Rush’s character may not be the main focus of events, but they all revolve around him. It was also very refreshing to see that he had obviously gotten the memo, play it big, camp it up, have a little fun before we start dragging people into vats of blood and cutting their heads off. Rush is having a blast, and I think that carries this film far past many of its foibles.

What Dark Castle wisely attempted to do was not try an obliterate the memory of William Castle’s film, but instead they amped up the double crosses, the vicious murders, and the freaky ghosts bringing the skeleton of the film along with them. Since the skeleton was such a major portion of Castle’s film, it only seems appropriate. Well that about wraps it up for today, but I still have eleven more goodies coming for you soon. So keep them comments coming and keep checking back as I keep counting down. Oh, and you folks keep reading so you can find out who my special guest if for today!

Bugg Rating 


Today’s guest, Chance Shirley,  made one of my favorite films of all time, Hide and Creep, if you haven’t seen it yet, it’s better than anything that’s going to be on this list for a while so you should check it out! Chance is a great dude, and this is his third year in a row participating in the Halloween Top 13. I’ve only got one other three time contributor this year (either people are slack or scared to think of remakes), and it makes me very happy to introduce my first one. Take it away Chance….

“Hey, man. Just wanted to drop my two cents on you regarding your Halloween remake series on your website. Is there a greater horror movie, remake or otherwise, than John Carpenter's THE THING? I don't think so. I also think Zack Snyder's DAWN OF THE DEAD is pretty watchable. Not nearly as good as the original, though.”

Those are both great picks Chance. I wonder if either of them will appear on the countdown. I don’t wonder very hard, but I do wonder. Ok, I bet they both do, but I shan’t tell you in what place. For that kind of information, you’re going to have to stay tuned to the countdown, and stay tuned to The Lair for any news on Chance. I know his second film, Interplanetary, is gearing up for a DVD release in 2011. Iin the meantime, you Netflix Instant Watchers check out Hide and Creep and come on back here tomorrow for more remake goodness.

(And if you don’t have your list in to the Halloween Top 13, I’m still looking for two more victims, ummm, participants, to take part. Click here for details.)





.

The Deadly Doll's Pick: Popcorn (1991)

Hey everyone. It’s that time for another film swap with my pal Emily from The Deadly Doll’s House of Horror Nonsense. Last month, you might remember that Emily assigned me the Asian cannibal flick, We Are Going To Eat You. This month she picked out 1991’s Popcorn in honor of Jill Schoelen, one of the guests of the upcoming Horrorhound Weekend that both Emily and I will be attending. Now I was familiar with Jill.  She also appeared in one of my favorite remakes, Phantom of the Opera (1989), as Christine opposite Robert England’s Phantom. Now after seeing Popcorn, I have to ask. What is the deal with the beautiful Ms. Schoelen and guys with deformed faces which they try and disguise? It seemed unusual to me that she made these two films back to back, and in fact one of Popcorn’s alternate titles is Phantom of the Cinema. The metaphor doesn’t extend to all her films though unless one of the cast members of D.C. Cab has something they’ve been hiding.

In Popcorn, Jill stars as Maggie, a film student who has been having reoccurring nightmares of a strange man, but she tries to put it out of her mind as she helps her film class get ready for a horror film marathon. After landing the Dreamland Theater, a nearly condemned cinema that once caught fire, as their venue, they assemble a number a movies to show that involve props in the style of William Castle’s theatrical stunts. Getting ready for the show, they come across the film Possessor, a film made by Laynard Gates the leader of a film cult and a man that Maggie begins to believe is her father. When the big night comes and the films start rolling, the bodies start stacking up, but Jill’s suspicion that her auteur patriarch is to blame turns out to be untrue as the killer is someone much closer than she could ever expect.

Originally, Popcorn was intended to be directed by writer/actor/ director Alan Ormsby who is best known for his scripts for Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things, My Bodyguard, and the 1982 remake of Cat People. After only three weeks or principal photography, Ormsby was taken off the job and replaced by actor Mark Herrier, best known as Billy in the Porky’s films, taking on his first directing job. It has been reported that the only thing that remained from Ormsby were the segments of the Castle inspired stunt films. Interestingly, I thought that the first half of the film, which was loaded with long sequences from the faux cult selections, dragged significantly, and the film also tended to cut back to the movie within the movie when I would have preferred more of the killer taking out his vengeance.

For the first hour, little kept me going through this film other then Schoelen who was charming in a way that always reminds me of Jennifer Connelly and the appearance of stalwart character actor Tony Roberts as Maggie’s teacher Mr. Davis. However in the last 40 minutes of film, the film changes pace as the reveal of the real killer entirely changes the dynamic of the film. Unfortunately, I get into the problem that the part of the film I liked has spoilers all over it. So before I get into it a bit, I wanted to give everyone a warning that I was going to tread toward the ending. The killer is revealed to be Maggie’s classmate Toby who was also caught in the fire that Maggie escaped as a child. Now, hidden behind a rubber mask, he’s returned to take his revenge. Tom Villard, who also starred as the baddie gang leader in Parasite, gives an inspired performance in the final act of the film that totally redeems the slow, padded opening of the film. Villard brought to the film an engaging and modern slasher that combined humor with more than enough of the essential creepiness needed to remain a menace. I could have easily watched him in several sequels which sadly did not materialize.

Popcorn is often compared to the other William Castle inspired film Matinee, but the two share little other than an admiration to the King of the Gimmick. Popcorn is a satisfying slasher that starts off a little weak, but the ending pays off so well that it saved the entire picture to me. My early reaction to the film was that it was another low end slasher that come out after the trend had really run its course, but with a simple bait and switch and a couple of good performances from Villard and Schoelen, Popcorn became much more than a hardened kernel. It filled up the bucket with enough clever ideas and entertaining scenes to make for a cinematic delight filled with buttery goodness. I want to thank Emily for recommending this one to me, and I hope you all go over there and check out her site for a review of Motorama, the film I recommended to her for this month.

Bugg Rating 


Straight Jacket (1964): Ms. Crawford Goes from Wire Hangers to Bloody Axes

That’s right it’s time again for another Wednesday With William, and this week I’ve got a film that I’ve wanted to see for a long, long time, 1964’s Straight Jacket. There are several reasons why this film enticed me, and I would be lying if I said one of those reasons was not the appearance of Joan Crawford. I could not resist seeing the star of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane and the subject of the bio-pic Mommy, Dearest as an axe wielding psycho. I also couldn’t resist a cast that included Diane Baker and George Kennedy, a script written by Robert Bloch, and, of course, the direction of Mr. Castle. All combined it sounded like a recipe for a great time if you axe me. (See what I did there. I said axe instead of ….oh, never mind, let’s get on with the synopsizing.)

Lucy Harbin (Joan Crawford) was out of town on the evening that her husband Frank (an unaccredited Lee Majors in his first film role) decided to take an old girlfriend back to their house for some fun. Unfortunately for the lovebirds, Lucy decided to come home early. Lucy catches the pair in the act and she beheads them with an axe while their daughter Carol looks on. Twenty years later, Carol (Diane Baker) is living with her Aunt and Uncle when she gets the news that her mother is cured and has been released from the asylum. After an awkward reunion, the mother and daughter become friends, and Carol takes Lucy out shopping. Carol dresses her mother in a wig and outfit that remind her of what she remembers her mom looking like, and Lucy soon starts to feel like her old self. When people start to missing, some begin to suspect that she’s feeling a little too much like her old self.

Before I get any further into the film I want to talk about a couple of things that were conspicuously missing from Straight Jacket. First off, there’s no intro from Mr. Castle on this film, and this lends itself directly into the second thing that was mostly missing, the gimmick. Unlike some of the more spectacular gimmicks (or spectacular claims) that Castle came up for his films, Straight Jacket’s tie in was simply a tiny, cardboard bloody axe. Castle had been advised by the money men to eliminate his gimmicks and instead send Crawford on tour to promote the film. It was only at the last minute that Castle decided to have the axes made. It’s too bad that Castle had to compromise on this one. I would have really liked to see what he would have come up with if he was unencumbered. By his next film, 1965’s I See What You Did (again with Crawford) he was back to his old tricks and installing seatbelts in the back row of the theaters to form a “Shock Section”.

Now to the film at hand, Straight Jacket was a very enjoyable watch even if it was devoid of some of Castle’s usual flair. What makes up for much of this is the tightly wound script by scenarist Robert Bloch. Bloch is most well known for his novel Psycho which led to the Alfred Hitchcock film. Straight Jacket is cut from a similar cloth with the villain being a flesh and blood murderer with not a trace of supernatural. The central mystery of the movie is fairly easy to unravel, but Bloch left enough wiggle room to where it was not completely obvious until the finale. The only deviation from his script comes in the last few moments of the film when an extra scene, which feels tacked on, was filmed at one of the star’s request. This portion of the film would almost take away from the proceedings, but for a final treat, Castle included the Columbia pictures logo at the end again. The woman with the torch is shown with her head resting at her feet and her torch blown out.

The script can’t stand alone and Castle really cast the hell out of this film. Joan Crawford, only a few years removed from Baby Jane, gives a great performance. Sure it’s a bit over the top, but I would expect no less from Miss Crawford. Her performance is delightful from every arch of her eyebrow to every sour expression. Miss Crawford didn’t think as much of her collaboration with Mr. Castle. “I hate being asked to discuss those dreadful horror pictures I made the mistake of starring in. They were all just so disappointing to me. I really had high expectations for some of them. I thought that William Castle and I did our best on Strait Jacket, but the script was ludicrous and unbelievable and that destroyed that picture.” It’s unfortunate for Joan that she could not step outside herself and travel into the future where maybe she could appreciate the camp value of her performance.

The film is clearly Crawford’s, but Castle always seemed to be careful to weave in a story of young love to appeal to the teen set. In this cast it is between Carol, played by Diane Baker, and Michael (John Anthony Hayes). Baker really shines even opposite Crawford, and it was really great to see her pop up in something again. The same year Straight Jacket was released Baker co-starred in Hitchcock’s Marnie as Sean Connery’s conniving sister. Hayes on the other hand did not have much of a career before or after, and he left little impression so it’s no wonder. On the other hand long time character actor George Kennedy, probably best remembered now for his performances opposite Leslie Neilson’s Naked Gun Films, really impresses in a small role as an ill fated farmhand.

Even though Castle did not infuse the movie with a lot of gimmicky flash, he still displays the steady directing hand that makes his movies so watchable. Lots of great shots are constructed around shadows, and cinematographer Arthur E. Arling came up with some really interesting angles. All combined, Straight Jacket is a solid film that comes up a tad short on the grand scale of Castle’s event pictures, but holds its own as a campy, well scripted, Psycho knockoff that benefits from Bloch’s presence and Castle’s steady hand. For Castle fans this is a must see, but it should be required watching for any fan of the one and only Joan Crawford.

Below the trailer I'm linking a video that contains Crawford's makeup and costume test for the film. I especially liked watching Joan being casual and playing with a puppy.

Bugg Rating


13 Ghosts (1960): Mr. Castle Gets the Blues

Come one, come all. It’s that special time of the week when we spend our Wednesday with William. In order for each of you to enjoy this review in all its glory, every reader has been issued a set of set of special invisible Script-O Goggles. As you read on you will find this review is full of special thrills and chills brought to vivid life by way of those magical, invisible, internet goggles. You will marvel at how vivid the color of the text is, how fine the font (Ariel like you’ve never experienced it before!), and you will want to bask in the glow of how clever and insightful I am. Those of you who’ve already donned your Script-O’s might even be feeling something like that already. No? Well, I assure you that as we explore the William Castle classic 13 Ghosts, you shall!

The Zorba family is down on their luck. Cyrus Zorba (Donald Woods) can’t even make ends meet to keep his family’s furniture. So when he gets a mysterious telegram and finds out that he’s inherited a fully outfitted mansion from a forgotten uncle, it’s the break that they’ve been needing. Unfortunately, along with being fully furnished, the house also comes fully stocked with a selection of 12 captured spirits. The Zorba family must survive the apparitions of a killer cook, headless lion tamer, and flaming skeletons without becoming the 13th ghost. If they make it, they might be lucky enough to find a hidden treasure, all of the departed Uncle’s cash, hidden somewhere in the house.

Usually I wait until a little later on to talk about the gimmick, but Illusion-O was so much of a part of this film. As the patrons entered the theater, they were given the Illusion-O viewer which you can see pictured on the left. At the beginning of the film, Mr. Castle explains that if you look through the blue part, for the faint of heart, the ghosts will disappear, and if you choose the red part, for the brave, they will all but leap out of the screen. The film is littered with moments where the film turns a light blue color, the words ‘Use Viewer” come on the screen, and an array of “ghosts” can be seen. While I understand the viewer did indeed work, the spirits can be seen by the naked eye. I would love to see the film with the viewer, but I didn’t even have a pair of 3-D glasses around to check it out with.

As much as the gimmick intrigued me, it does feel a bit intrusive to the film in a general sense. The narrative is frequently interrupted for a lengthy ghost sequence that even with the viewer doesn't appear to be action packed. Now that’s not to say I did not enjoy several of them. The ghost lion with the headless ghost lion tamer was very amusing, and who among us does not like a flaming skeleton? This time Castle came up with a promotion that actually did work, but not so much with the film itself. Don‘t get me wrong. As a theater experience, I can‘t see how it wouldn‘t be a blast, but most of us will never get to see this film beyond our home. Looking at 13 Ghosts as a film, it doesn’t hold up as well as House on Haunted Hill or The Tingler.

One of the other reasons for this is the Zorba family. Donald Woods was fifth billed as the father Cyrus Zorba, but the long time character actor was the high point in the film’s cast. Grabbing top billing was child star Charles Herbert as the idiotic child Buck Zorba. Herbert, and Buck, about drove me crazy because this kid was a flat out moron. There’s just no two ways around it. Just watch the scene he shares with Route 66 star Martin Milner as Ben Rush, the devious lawyer. This kid can be talked into anything by any adult. I guess I should be thankful that the lawyer just wanted to steal money from the family because there’s no telling what Buck might have agreed to.

Then you’ve got Zorba’s daughter, Madea. Now there’s nothing wrong with Jo Morrow or her acting, and I even found her quite fetching. The problem is her name, Madea. William Castle and screenwriter Robb White could not have foreseen Tyler Perry, and so they could not have anticipated the audience thinking about “family reunions” or how she can “do bad all by herself”. I, on the other hand, quite maturely could not resist cracking a few such jokes. On the other end of the references spectrum was Margaret Hamilton. Playing the creepy housekeeper who gets thrown in with the creepy house, the actress, better known as The Wicked Witch of the West, winks at her own image in a time long before The Wizard of Oz gained cult status.

The parts of the film that were uninhibited by the blue filter looked quite good thanks to cinematographer Joseph F. Biroc. He would go on to shoot such diverse films such as Confessions of an Opium Eater, Blazing Saddles, and Flight of the Phoenix. 13 Ghosts got a score from frequent Castle collaborator Von Dexter who both has a badass name and really carries the film though the disjointed gimmick driven moments. As a package, 13 Ghosts is an entertaining film, but it does lose a little something for the home viewer. It also doesn’t have the narrative strength of some of Castle's other films.

Now before I close out, I have to talk about the 2001 remake, Thirteen Ghosts. I’m sure there are plenty of folks who will disagree with me, but this is one case where I enjoy the remake more than the original. It dispatched with the Illusion-O gimmick, though kept the viewers intact though a plot point, and amped up the ghosts into a group of genuinely creepy creatures. While the remake doesn’t have the Castle’s flair, it does provide a solid argument in favor of the remake. One of the things any remake needs to do is remind you of the original. Each time I take in Tony Shalhoub and Rah Digga battling The Angry Princess and The Jackal, it makes we want to take a second look at Castle’s classic so I can bask in the comforting blue glow of Illusion-O.

Bugg Rating

Mr. Sardonicus (1961): Wednesday With William Will Make You Grin

Welcome back everyone. Before we get started here, I’m going to hand out stuffed mackerels to each one of you readers out there. You may wonder what you’ll be doing with a stuffed mackerel. Well, just hang onto it for now, you’ll need it later on. Because before I can get into that, I think I should talk about this week’s Wednesday With William film, Mr. Sardonicus. As the early ‘60’s dawned, William Castle was on a winning streak. The House on Haunted Hill, The Tingler, and 13 Ghosts were all great successes, and with each release Castle’s reputation as a showman grew exponentially as well. Always looking for a new angle to promote his film, the inspiration for the Mr. Sardonicus’ gimmick grew from the studio being unhappy with the ending. So, Mr. Castle thought it was high time he gave the audience a choice.

The film introduces us to Sir Robert Cargrave (Ronald Lewis), a respected surgeon who has a specialty in muscular relaxation. He is delivered a letter from his old flame Maude (Audrey Dalton) asking him to come to her home in Gorslava because he is urgently needed. When he arrives, he is reunited with Maude who is now unhappily married to the mysterious, masked Baron Sardonicus (Guy Rolfe). She has asked Robert to make the trip in hopes that he can cure the Baron of his curse. Years ago when the Baron tried to recover a winning lottery ticket from the casket of his dead father, his face became permanently contorted into a ghastly grin. Over the years, the Baron has retained a tenuous grasp on his sanity, and now he insists that Robert help him or there will be dire consequences for Maude.

Mr. Sardonicus was a different kind of film for William Castle. It had much more in common with the moody gothic horrors of the 1940’s than his own contemporary productions. It is easy to see how this film could have been made years earlier, perhaps even as some kind of twisted remake of Paul Levi’s 1922 film The Man Who Laughs. Castle optioned the story from Ray Russell after reading it in Playboy, and he also employed the writer to adapt it for the screen. It was Russell’s first screen credit, but he would go on to pen 1962’s Premature Burial, William Castle’s Zots! (1962), and the 1963 classic X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes. Russell’s script is well paced and moves along with none of the drag of the gothic horror films that inspired it.

While part of the credit surely rests with Russell, Castle really made this film what it was. Castle and veteran cinematographer Burnett Guffey captured the gothic feeling of the film perfectly. The moody lighting and artistic angles that feel like a throwback to German expressionist film give the film a level of tension on a purely cinematic level. If there was one drawback to Mr. Sardonicus, it would be the facial appliance worn by the title character to distort his face. It is creepy looking, but by today’s standards (or even 1961’s) it looks a bit cheap. Wisely, it is mostly kept off camera, and Castle allows its few appearances to be brief and shocking. I can’t help but compare Sardonicus’ grin with the makeup Tim Burton would use for Jack Nicholson’s Joker in Batman.

Acting from behind immobile makeup or a full facial mask for most of the film, Guy Rolfe really does a great job in the titular role of Sardonicus. Except for a small portion of the film, Rolfe’s voice must carry his performance. Rolfe was a veteran of costume dramas, and he definitely brought the same kind of grandeur to the role of Sardonicus. It was especially fascinating to see him play the character before and after the events that leave his face with the horrible smile. He made the most of his scenes unhindered by effects, and he filled them with a pathos that really informs the character arc of Baron Sardonicus. Later in Rolfe’s career he would make several other horror gems such as Dolls (1987) and 1973’s …And Now the Screaming Starts, but his last few films would give him another great horror role when he played Andre Toulon in the third, fourth, and fifth installments of the Puppet Master series.

The other standout in the cast is Oskar Homolka as Sardonicus’ one eyed, trollish servant Krull. Homolka was a lifelong character actor, and he has one of those faces that the viewer knows they’ve seen even if they can’t place it. His most memorable role before Sardonicus was Hitchcock’s 1936 film Sabotage, but that performance pales in comparison to the deviant, yet sympathetic, turn Homolka has as Krull. The part could easily have been nothing more than a one dimensional “Igor” type part; instead, Homolka used a few memorable character traits to tell a story beyond the written dialog. This is also true to a lesser extent of Erika Peters as Sardonicus’ first wife Elinka. She only had a few moments of screen time, but her conniving, money-grubbing character, is surely a memorable performance.

The weakest portion of the film, as seems like is often the case in Castle’s films, was the young couple involved in the story. Ronald Lewis and Audrey Dalton barely make an impression as Sir Robert and his unrequited love, Baroness Maude. Their story is bland and restrained, which fits the gothic storytelling, but left me waiting expectantly for the next time Sardonicus would show up. Lewis does have a few entertaining lines explaining his new fangled gadget, the hypodermic needle. Each time he would say anything about it, he took the time to sound it out which was nice. This wasn’t just entertainment. It was an education.

Speaking of entertainment, I must get back to Castle’s gimmick. As the filmmaker explains at the start of the picture, the audience was given a card with a picture of a thumb on it. With this card, they would determine the fate of Sardonicus at the end of the film. The idea for this one hit Castle when the studio asked for a happy ending to replace the grim finale of the story. There is some controversy over whether such an ending was shot, but it seems pretty universally accepted that it was never shown. At the end of the film, Castle appears again to ask for a thumbs up or down vote, and then he proceeds to tally them right from the screen. Calculating that no audience out to see a William Castle film was going to spare the villain as ghastly end, he gave the audience what they wanted every time.

So you might be wondering why I handed out stuffed mackerels to each of you as you came in. First off, I wanted to see how long I could get you guys and gals to hold a stuffed mackerel. Let me say, I’m pretty impressed. Now they do have a purpose though. With those mackerels, you’re going to help me determine the Bugg rating for this film. So hold them up, or don’t, whatever your preference may be. Ok, ok, let’s see. Yes, we’ve got a result. Here’s the grade that I give it because you voted for it with stuffed mackerels…

Bugg Rating

The Tingler (1959): Wednesdays With William Gives You a Buzz

Today when a movie studio wants to try a gimmick all they can muster up is blue people flying around in 3D, but in the ‘50’s and ‘60’s they knew how it was done. Yet only one man could be called the King of the Gimmicks, and that man is William Castle. Starting this week and running through the next couple of months, each Wednesday I’ll be looking at one of Castle’s films and the trick he had up his sleeve to promote it. I’ve always found Mr. Castle to be a fascinating character, a king of P.T. Barnum for the motion picture era, and while he was involved with many, many great films, the first that always comes to my mind is 1959’s The Tingler.

After the success of Castle’s film House on Haunted Hill, Columbia Pictures was eager to capitalize on the pairing of Castle and Vincent Price. Robb White, who had written House on Haunted Hill and Castle’s film Macabre, was brought in to write the new film. He took his inspiration from a rubber worm that was made, but not used, in Haunted Hill and grafted on his own experiences with the then legal drug LSD. What he came up with is one of the most absurd plots ever put to film, but it worked directly into the hands of Castle who had an incredible idea for a gimmick.

Vincent Price plays Dr. Warren Chapin, a pathologist who also has a hobby of studying the effects of fear. As Dr. Chapin says, “there’s a force inside of us that science knows nothing about, the force of fear.” Chapin and his assistant David Morris (Darryl Hickman) will stop at nothing to further their research even if it means scaring cats, dogs, or Chapin’s own unfaithful wife. They discover that there seems to be an organism that forms on the spine when people are frightened, and only the release of fear by screaming will make the beast, which they dub the Tingler, subside. Chapin experiments with LSD to try to elicit extreme fear in himself, but he can’t keep himself from screaming. So he injects a deaf/mute woman (Judith Evelyn) with the drug, and she dies of extreme fright. During the autopsy, he removes the Tingler from her back so he can study it. It doesn’t take long before it gets loose, and now everyone must scream to save their lives.

During the climax of the film with the Tingler gets loose in a movie theater is when William Castle’s gimmick went to work. The Tingler was billed as being filmed in Percepto, and Castle made a disclaimer for the beginning to the film explaining what might happen to the audience. In part he says, “ I feel obligated to warn you that some of the sensations— some of the physical reactions which the actors on the screen will feel— will also be experienced, for the first time in motion picture history, by certain members of this audience.” It was only certain members of the audience because only some seats where equipped with the vibrating box that went off. For years, many people thought that the audience was actually given electric shocks, and Castle didn’t help matters by stating it incorrectly in his biography. The film going experience didn’t end with vibrating seats. Castle also planted people in the audience to scream at key times and women who would faint and have to be taken from the theater. Seeing The Tingler must have been unlike seeing any other film, and it’s an experience I wish I could have had.

The gimmick aside, the film is filled with some great performances. In the documentary about The Tingler included on the disk, someone pointed out that Vincent Price could deliver the most absurd dialog and make it sound feasible. He definitely was working overtime in that department with this film. The best dialog in the film has to be the interchanges between Price’s Warren Chapin and his philandering wife Isabel played by Patricia Cutts. Here’s one of my favorites:

Isabel: "You know, Warren, you've lost contact with living people. Nobody means anything to you anymore, unless they're dead and you can root around in them with your sharp little knives. There's a word for you."
Warren: "There's several for you."

This verbal sparing really gives the film some pep in the beginning if the film when things are getting started. Price and Cutts had an explosive chemistry that leapt off the screen. Although there would have been no reason for it, I did kind of wish for more scenes between the two of them.

There are also several other supporting roles I have to mention. Pamela Lincoln played Isabel’s younger sister, and she was engaged to actor Darryl Hickman. William Castle got Hickman to take the part to help Lincoln’s career, and some places say Hickman was talked into doing the part for free. Both Hickman and Lincoln are adequate in their parts, but neither one are particularly memorable. On the other hand, Judith Evelyn as the deaf/mute Ms. Higgins was really good. Ms. Higgins and her husband Ollie (Phillip Coolidge) own a silent movie theater, and the character that Evelyn played seemed like she stepped right off that silent movie screen. I really enjoyed watching the performance. It’s also kind of fascinating that Evelyn’s other widely known performance is also one without words. She played Miss Lonely Hearts in Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window.

The Tingler, without all the history and gimmicks, is a standard late 50’s shocker with some pretty shoddy special effects. If you can’t see the wire dragging the Tingler around the screen, then you must not be looking very hard. Yet the magic of William Castle rubs off all over this film, and even fifty years later, it still holds up as an enjoyably fun film. I had a great time watching it, and if you haven’t seen it, I think you’ll have a great time too. So check it out, and don’t forget to scream because it just might save your life!



Bugg Rating